Why a Type 1 Report May Not Meet Every Customer Requirement

An enterprise customer is ready to proceed: your software product has passed the technical evaluation and pricing discussions are complete. Procurement then requests your latest SOC 2 report. Nothing like that exists yet.

Australian SaaS companies entering larger markets face an immediate challenge in this situation. Security assurance takes time, and a rushed, wrong assessment may not satisfy the customer’s requirements. The solution begins with understanding what the buyer expects and planning backward from the deadline.

Begin calmly by finding out exactly what was asked for and by when. Ask before assuming: a request sometimes leaves more room than it first seems to.

Start by Learning Which SOC 2 Report Is Required

SOC 2 reports don’t all provide the same level of assurance. When responding to enterprise security requirements, the distinction between SOC 2 type 1 vs type 2 matters. Whether relevant controls are suitably designed at a particular date is what Type 1 evaluates. Type 2 examines their design and operating effectiveness over a defined period.

Many enterprise buyers specifically request Type 2 because it provides evidence covering actual operations, though some may accept Type 1 temporarily. Prior to commissioning an examination, confirm with the customer the report type, the required scope, and acceptable reporting dates.

Keep a written record of the answers, because the report type, scope, and dates all drive the plan and the budget. Where the customer’s requirements are unclear, ask for the exact wording in the contract or the security questionnaire.

Plan Your Timeline Around the Observation Period

A SOC 2 type 2 examination cannot be completed simply by preparing documentation and scheduling an auditor. Throughout the reporting period, the organization must operate its relevant controls. An initial examination may cover a period of three months, whereas subsequent reports commonly cover longer ones.

Where your business needs to demonstrate access reviews, security training, or change approvals, those activities must happen, and be documented, during the applicable window. Work backward from the customer deadline to find out whether the requested report can realistically be delivered on time.

When the deadline can’t be met within the observation period, say so to the customer early. Hearing about the gap early, some customers are willing to discuss interim steps such as a dated plan.

What Exactly Are You Paying For?

Many businesses search for SOC 2 type 2 certification, yet SOC 2 does not issue certificates.

An independent examination against the applicable AICPA Trust Services Criteria is performed by a licensed CPA firm, which issues an attestation report. The report describes the assessed system, relevant controls, testing procedures, and the auditor’s opinion.

It’s that document, often shared under a confidentiality agreement, that customers typically review. A SOC type 2 report also relates to a specific historical period. It doesn’t automatically give assurance about every change made afterward.

Count the Costs Before You Start

SOC 2 preparation costs more than just an independent examination fee. Assistance with developing policies, conducting risk assessments, preparing evidence, training employees, and arranging security testing may be needed.

Siege Cyber advertises a SOC 2 compliance package priced at AUD $2,750 per month, excluding GST, over twelve months for businesses with up to 50 employees. The advertised offer applies to eligible contracts that are signed by December 31, 2026. Its package includes compliance preparation, training, a compliance platform, and external penetration testing.

Billed separately is the independent CPA examination, with Siege Cyber indicating typical fees of approximately AUD 5,000–15,000, depending on scope and complexity. Make sure you confirm current pricing, eligibility, and deliverables before committing.

When Your Report Is Already Out of Date

Say your Type 2 report covers January through June, yet a customer requests assurance in October. The report doesn’t look at the months in between. Some customers may be willing to accept a bridge letter, issued by management, that describes relevant changes since the reporting period ended.

However, acceptance depends on the customer’s requirements, and a bridge letter does not replace an independent examination. Discuss reporting gaps early rather than assuming an older report will satisfy procurement.

Make Your Compliance Investment Work Beyond One Contract

With fixed-price consulting packages and independent audit coordination, Siege Cyber provides Australian-based SOC 2 readiness support. Growing software companies get the most from connecting compliance preparation with actual operational responsibilities.

Control owners should be assigned, security records maintained, and a reporting schedule established to support future customer reviews. Rather than simply helping respond to the current request, a successful SOC 2 project should leave your business better prepared for the next enterprise opportunity.

The next audit cycle is less of a scramble when the evidence you collect has been kept organized from the start.

Have Problem with your Gardening?
Please Call : +12127389581

Scroll to Top